Legal Opinion

Aiken v. Franklin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 27, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, entered by direction of Start, J., (acting for a judge of the 4th district.)

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

In the complaint in this action, plaintiff, with some particularity as to details, alleged a breach of a covenant- of seisin and right to convey, contained, as he contends, in a deed of certain real property in the state of Mississippi, which deed was executed and delivered by defendant, as grantor, unto plaintiff, as grantee; a copy thereof being made a part of the complaint. We are not advised by the complaint as to where the conveyance was executed and delivered, nor as to the existence of any statute in. the state of Mississippi regulating the form of a deed, or bearing upon the subject…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  2. Frost v. RaymondNew York Supreme Court · 1804
  3. Woolley v. . NewcombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bliss Townsite Co. v. Morris-Roberts Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Callaway v. SeatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API