Legal Opinion

CONCEPCION v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 21, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00133Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ALBERTO CONCEPCION, Civil Action No. 25-0133 (SDW) Petitioner, v. OPINION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. IT APPEARING THAT: 1. Pro se Petitioner Alberto Concepcion filed a “Motion/Affidavit/Brief Challenging the Legalities of the Petitioner’s, Supervised Federal Probation/ Fine/ Fabrication of Evidence /Forced Signatures, & the Confiscation of the Petitioner’s Money in Points I to V, Including the Request of Quashing the Charges-Indictment,” which this Court construes as a motion to correct, vacate, or set aside his federal conviction…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. In Re: Kensington International Limited and Springfield Associates, Llc, in Re: D.K. Acquisition Partners, L.P. Fernwood Associates, L.P. And Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, in Re: Usg CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. Janet Smith and David Smith v. J. Joseph Danyo, M.DCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Kerry David WilenskyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Douglas KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API