Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Tinsley

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 2009No. B200639Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

In probate matters, justice can be illusive if not absent. In Estate of Shellenbarger (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 894 [86 Cal.Rptr.3d 862], we acknowledged our obligation to follow the law of succession even when we believed to do so was unfair. We had no choice in light of our Supreme Court’s admonition that it is vain for the courts to argue against the injustice of statutory rules governing the law of succession. (Estate of De Cigaran (1907) 150 Cal. 682, 688 [89 P. 833].)

But in the case we decide here, the Probate Code itself gives the probate judge discretion to reach a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western Oil & Gas Ass'n v. Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re Estate of De CigaranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Burden v. AgnewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Gagnier v. GagnierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API