Royal Interocean Lines v. Panama Canal Co.
District Court, Canal Zone
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge.*
This matter came on trial before the Court. All material facts are stipulated by the parties. The only question of law presented to the Court is whether, under the circumstances of this case certain sections of the Canal Zone Code operate to raise the doctrine of sovereign immunity to thereby bar recovery of certain damages by Plaintiff, the owner of the M/V STRAAT HONG KONG, against Defendant, the Panama Canal Company. The Court finds that it does not.(i) Stipulated Facts
On June 7, 1977 Plaintiffs vessel, STRAAT HONG KONG, came into the Panama Canal from its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miguel Antonio Aparicio v. Swan Lake, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., Third Party v. Panama Canal Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. Panama Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Gulf Oil Corporation, as Owner Pro Hac Vice, of the Steamship Gulfspray, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Panama Canal Company, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Arthur H. Mathiesen, as Owner of the M/s Bettina v. Panama Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Tsakos Shipping & Trading, S.A. v. M/T "TABOGA"Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.