Legal Opinion

Huntley v. Rosebud Economic Development Corporation

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 11, 2023No. 3:22-cv-01172Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KATEY HUNTLEY and GARY Case No. 22-cv-1172-L-MDD 12 JACKSON, et al., 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER: 14 v. (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT 777 PARTNERS MOTION TO 15 COMPEL ARBITRATION 16 [ECF NO. 8]; and 17 ROSEBUD ECONOMIC (2) DENYING DEFENDANT 777 DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, et 18 al. PARTNER’S MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT [ECF NO. 19 Defendants. 9] 20 21 Pending before the Court are Defendant 777 Partner, LLC’s (“777”) Motion to 22 Compel Arbitration [ECF No. 8] and Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 9], in this putative class 23 action.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API