Legal Opinion

United States v. Andrews

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided January 28, 2004No. 6:02-cv-00258PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION SUPPORTING A DEPARTURE IN SENTENCING

BIERY, District Judge.

“If the law supposes that ... the law is... a idiot.... and the worst I wish the law is, that his eye may be opened by experience — by experience.”

Mr. Bumble Charles Dickens, The Adventures of Oliver Twist 327 (Country Life Press 1900) (1897).

Mr. Bumble might feel the same about the sentencing law in this case. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3551-3673, 28 U.S.C. §§ 991-998.

The sentencing guidelines for assessing punishments in the federal courts work reasonably well in the large percentage of cases before this Court. See also U.S. Gen.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. BartDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1997
  4. United States v. DelossantosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API