United States v. Delossantos
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM. *
Fred Delossantos appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for bank fraud. He argues that the district court abused its discretion by: (1) refusing to grant him a reduction in his offense level for acceptance of responsibility and (2) upwardly departing from the applicable guideline range.
In light of the evidence in the record regarding Delossantos’ post-plea criminal activity, the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied him points for acceptance of responsibility. Delossantos’ post-plea conduct was entirely inconsistent with the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Eddie Wayne RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Esau Juarez-OrtegaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. John T. HefferonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Yolanda C. LaraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Cano-GuelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. AndrewsDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2004
- Delossantos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004