Legal Opinion

Kings County Economic Community Development Ass'n v. Hardin

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 21, 1971No. C-70 2275PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF TRANSFER UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1408(a).

WOLLENBERG, District Judge.

Plaintiffs herein ask this Court to compel the Secretary of Agriculture to consider the relationship of certain forms of environmental pollution to the federal farm subsidy program. They cite the National Environmental Protection Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-27, and the Federal Water Quality Improvement Act of 1970, 33 U.S.C. § 1151 et seq. These acts, among other things, require all agencies of the Federal Government to “identify and develop methods and procedures, in consultation with the Council on Environmental Quality * * *…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the U. S. ARMYDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1971
  2. Johnson v. KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Saravia v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  2. Hartke v. Federal Aviation AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1973
  3. Buffalo Teachers Federation, Inc. v. HelsbyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  4. Turner v. CF&I STEEL CORP.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Superior Oil Co. v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API