City of Lawrence v. Lawrence Patrolmen's Ass'n
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
Although the precise question, the interrelation of G. L. c. 41, § 100, and G. L. c. 41, § 11 IF, is novel, the applicable principles of the law of arbitration are familiar. We decide that the provisions of § 100 do not preclude submission to arbitration of the question of entitlement to paid leave under § 11 IF, and that a motion by the city of Lawrence (city) to vacate an arbitration award that conferred paid leave was rightly denied.
General Laws c. 41, § 100, as amended through St. 1970, *705c. 27, requires employers of police officers or fire fighters to indemnify them for medical expenses…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Howcroft v. City of PeabodyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Plymouth-Carver Regional School District v. J. Farmer & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Lewis v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- City of Lynn v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- ZVI Construction Co., LLC v. LevyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- Zielinski v. Connecticut Valley Sanitary Waste Disposal, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- City of Springfield v. Local Union No. 648Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Downey v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2026
- Halliday v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004