Legal Opinion

City of Lawrence v. Lawrence Patrolmen's Ass'n

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 12, 2002No. 00-P-1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

Although the precise question, the interrelation of G. L. c. 41, § 100, and G. L. c. 41, § 11 IF, is novel, the applicable principles of the law of arbitration are familiar. We decide that the provisions of § 100 do not preclude submission to arbitration of the question of entitlement to paid leave under § 11 IF, and that a motion by the city of Lawrence (city) to vacate an arbitration award that conferred paid leave was rightly denied.

General Laws c. 41, § 100, as amended through St. 1970, *705c. 27, requires employers of police officers or fire fighters to indemnify them for medical expenses…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Howcroft v. City of PeabodyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  3. Plymouth-Carver Regional School District v. J. Farmer & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Lewis v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. City of Lynn v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ZVI Construction Co., LLC v. LevyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  2. Zielinski v. Connecticut Valley Sanitary Waste Disposal, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. City of Springfield v. Local Union No. 648Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  4. Downey v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2026
  5. Halliday v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API