Richard C. Raugust v. Eric K. Shinseki
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
HAGEL, Judge:
Richard C. Raugust appeals through counsel a March 20, 2008, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision denying him basic eligibility for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical care benefits. This appeal is timely, and the Court has jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision pursuant to 38 U.S.C. §§ 7252(a) and 7266(a). The case was sent to a panel to address an issue of first impression, which is whether the statute and regulation establishing a mandatory 24-month minimum service period before a veteran is eligible for basic VA medical care violates the constitutional…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Frankel v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Califano v. TorresSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wood v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Hilkert v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Constance Copeland v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012
- Constance Copeland v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012
- Constance Copeland v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012