People v. Grow
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIAN, J.
Gordon Grow, William Girolomoni and Pamela Bareford have appealed from orders by which they were admitted to probation after a jury found each of them guilty of one count of pandering (Pen. Code, § 266i) and one count of pimping (Pen. Code, § 266h). The verdicts are well supported by evidence that appellant Grow was the owner, and with appellants Girolomoni and Bareford was involved in the management and operation of a so-called “encounter studio” in which, for money, male customers were orally copulated or masturbated by female employees. Crucial to the prosecution’s case…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. SirhanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. BenjaminCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. FixlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. FreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979