Legal Opinion

Duffy v. Throwbridge

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 28, 1976No. 57900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

335 So.2d 30 (1976)

Mark D. DUFFY, Plaintiff-Appellee-Relator,

v.

George E. THROWBRIDGE and Allstate Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants-Respondents.

No. 57900.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1976.

Dissenting Opinion July 28, 1976.

Felicien P. Lozes, Drury, Lozes & Curry, New Orleans, for defendants-respondents.

Steven R. Plotkin, New Orleans, for plaintiff-applicant.

TATE, Justice.

We granted certiorari, 327 So.2d 649 (1976), primarily to review whether a party has the right to oral argument when a case is "reargued" in the court of appeal, when so required by Article 5, Section 8(B) of the…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Duffy v. ThrowbridgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Dinvaut v. Phoenix of Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roger v. Estate of MoultonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. Perkins v. Entergy Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Logan v. Louisiana Dock Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  4. Windham v. Security Ins. Co. of HartfordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Gaudet v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API