Legal Opinion
In Re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 27, 2000No. 99-197 TFHPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION— Re: Personal Jurisdiction
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are the motions of defendants Rhone-Poulenc S.A. (“RPSA”), BASF Aktiengesellschaft (“BASF AG”), and F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. (“Roche Ltd”) 1 to dismiss the Cargill, Inc., et al. v. F. Hoffman-La Roche, et al., action for lack of personal jurisdiction. Also pending are numerous motions by other defendants in the Vitamins Antitrust Litigation for determination of the governing law on the question of personal jurisdiction under the Clayton Act, i.e. whether the test is one of national or local…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brunette MacHine Works, Ltd. v. Kockum Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kent B. Crane v. Archie Carr, IIICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- In Re Magnetic Audiotape Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Diamond Chemical Co. v. Atofina Chemicals, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Call of the Wild Movie, LLC v. DOES 1-1,062District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Estate of Esther Klieman v. Palestinian AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- CITY OF MOUNDRIDGE, KS. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.