Legal Opinion
Carroll v. City of Albuquerque
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided October 13, 2010No. CIV 10-0588 JB/ACTPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion to Remand to State Court, filed July 1, 2010 (Doc. 5). The Court held a hearing on August 18, 2010. The primary issue is whether section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185, completely preempts Plaintiff Michael Carroll’s claims of breach of implied employment contract based on Defendant City of Albuquerque’s polices. Because section 301 governs claims substantially dependent on analysis of a collective-bargaining agreement, and the Court…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Perez v. Qwest Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Benavidez v. Sandia National LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Firebird Structures, LCC v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local Union No. 1505District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- Elliott v. Tulsa Cement, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2019
- Buscema v. Wal-Mart Stores East LPDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.