Legal Opinion
Berea Bus Lines Co. v. Seminatore
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 16, 1969No. 29088PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
This is an action brought by plaintiff, Berea Bus Lines Company, to vacate, after term, a default judgment obtained against it by the defendants, Natalie and Charles Seminatore. In plaintiff’s second amended petition, Section 2325.01 (G), Revised Code, was asserted as the statutory ground for vacating the judgment. Section 2325.01 (G), Revised Code, reads;
“The Court of Common Pleas or the Court of Appeals may vacate or modify its own final order, judgment, or decree after the term at which it was made:
U * # *
“(Gr) For unavoidable casualty or misfortune, preventing the party from prosecuting…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hobbs v. Martin Marietta CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Spencer v. American United Cab Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Edgar v. Armored Carrier CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Stehman v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Andring v. AndringOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Adomeit v. BaltimoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Antonopoulos v. EisnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
- Midwest Sportservice, Inc. v. AndreoliOhio Court of Appeals · 1981