Legal Opinion

People v. Wallington

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1926No. Docket No. 1372PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

[1] It appears from the face of the application for a stay of execution of the judgment under section 1243 of the Penal Code that the appeal from the judgment is abortive and that the order made after judgment necessarily must be affirmed. The appeal from the judgment was not taken in time. (Pen. Code, sec. 1239; Starr v. Superior Court, 23 Cal.App. 670 [139 P. 241].) [2] The sufficiency of the indictment could not be questioned on the motion made in the lower court to set aside the judgment after it had become final. (People v. Mooney,178 Cal. 525 [174 P. 325]; People v. Reid, 195…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Starr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. EganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. People v. CostonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. People v. SchwarzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API