Legal Opinion
London Assur. Co. v. Proceeds of the Allianca
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 10, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Admiralty. Claims on surplus moneys.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
The steamships AHianca, Seguranca and Advance having been sold under process, and the proceeds paid into court, as stated in the previous cases of The Allianca and The Seguranca, 63 Fed. 726; The Vigilancia, Id. 733; and the questions concerning maritime liens thereon having been adjudged in the cases above named, and in the cases of Freights of The Kate, Id. 707, and Hard v. The Advance, Id. 142, petitions have now been filed in behalf of Brown Bros, and of Hard & Band, based upon the same claims, alleging an equitable lien, or right of priority, as against the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Thomas v. Western Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Miltenberger v. Logansport Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Burnham v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The WabashDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1922
- Brown v. Proceeds of SegurancaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1895
- Huntington v. The AlliancaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1895
- The MaicawayDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938