Legal Opinion · Dissent

South Gwinnett Venture v. Pruitt

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1973No. Nos. 71-3420, 71-3421Published

1DissentBootle, District Judge

(dissenting) :

I respectfully dissent. I would affirm for all reasons stated by the Trial Court in his memorandum opinion, Rockbridge Associates, Ltd. v. Pruitt, 341 F.Supp. 703 (N.D.Ga.1971), plus an additional reason to be stated. I agree with the Trial Court “that plaintiff was afforded procedural due process in connection with the various hearings before local zoning authorities” and that “there is nothing to indicate that the decision of the Commissioners could be found to be arbitrary.” The majority opinion groups these two cases together and over-reacts, I think, to the contention of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API