Legal Opinion

Ezzard v. Frick & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 23, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Conversion. Title. Fraud. Estoppel. Trover. Be- . fore Judge Hammond. Fulton Superior Court. . September Term, 1885. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Chief Justice.

This is an action of trover brought by Frich; & Company against William Ezzard- for the recovery of an engine for sawing and ginning purposes. The plaintiffs elected to take the value of the engine and hire, and recovered nine hundred dollars! On the denial of a new trial, Judge Ezzard excepted, and the case is here to be reviewed on assignments of error on the several grounds of the motion'. for a new trial.

The machine was sold by Anderson, as agent for Frick. & Company, to Wimpy,- taking Wimpy’s notes for purchase, except ■ one hundred dollars, which Wimpy paid cash.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woods v. McCallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  2. Goodwin v. MaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
  3. Sims v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elder v. Woodruff Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. O'Neill Manufacturing Co. v. WoodleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Jaques v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. Peoples Loan & Finance Corp. v. McBurnetteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Waldrip v. Associates Financial Services Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API