Legal Opinion
William Ward Ehlert v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 4, 1970No. 21930PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, on June 14, 1964, was ordered to report for induction and thereafter sought to reopen his classification in order to establish his status as a conscientious objector. Subsequently, he was convicted of failing to submit to induction into the Armed Forces in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462.
Selective Service Regulations, 32 C.F. R. § 1625.2, in pertinent part, provide:
“The classification of a registrant shall not be reopened after the local board has mailed to such registrant an Order to Report for Induction * * * unless the local board first specifically…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. David Arthur GeareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Richard Glenn Keene v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Parrott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. SchoebelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Robert Nolen Briggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- United States v. James Gordon LansingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Steven Antone CamaraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Joel ZiskowskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Roger Sutton SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Michael Lee LowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.