Geddie v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FICKLING, Associate Judge:
After a trial by jury, appellants were convicted of being present in an illegal establishment (hereinafter PIE) in violation of D.C.Code 1967, § 22-1515(a). On this appeal appellants challenge the sufficiency of the evidence upon which they were convicted. After a careful review of the record, we have concluded that the evidence was sufficient, therefore, we affirm.
In October 1970 a Mr. Frank Macklin was granted permission to use an apartment located within the District of Columbia as a neighborhood drug rehabilitation center until such permission was withdrawn. On…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. FleischmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Rossi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Conley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Hinton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
- In re T.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025