Legal Opinion

State v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 2006No. COA05-63PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Defendant Danny Boyd appeals from his convictions for possession of cocaine with intent to manufacture, sell, or deliver; trafficking in cocaine; and maintaining a dwelling for the purpose of keeping or selling cocaine. We uphold his convictions for possession and trafficking. With respect to his conviction on the maintáining a dwelling charge, however, we hold that the trial court erred when it allowed a police officer to testify that, prior to being Mirandized, defendant had incriminated himself by giving his home address in response to a routine booking question. Defendant is,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. State v. ToneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. LeginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. LakeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API