Legal Opinion

Irwin Borough School District v. North Huntingdon Township School District

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1953No. Appeal, No. 63PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The basic legal question involved on this appeal is whether a court of quarter sessions has jurisdiction to impose liability upon one school district in favor of another for the tuition of pupils of the first district attending school in the latter during litigation over a municipal annexation ordinance which is the subject of a complaint in the court of quarter sessions.

On February 20, 1948, the borough of Irwin adopted an ordinance annexing to its corporate area adjacent land lying in the township of North Huntingdon. Both the township and the school district of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownmillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Philadelphia v. Ridge Ave. Ry. Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1891
  3. Irwin Borough Annexation Case (No. 1)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Wall v. WallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Federal Land Bank of Baltimore v. PutnamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Speyer, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Regelman v. Brennan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1954
  3. Russell v. BridgensNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Russell v. BridgensNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Stackhouse v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API