Legal Opinion

Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Stanley

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 12, 1983No. CA 82-81PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melvin Mayfield, Chief Judge.

The question in this case is whether the appellee had an insurable interest in a piece of farm machinery at the time it was damaged by fire. The trial court, sitting as a jury, decided for the appellee and the insurance company has appealed. We affirm.

The machine involved is a cotton picker which appellee Earl Stanley purchased from Roberson Farm Equipment in 1976. The purchase was financed by International Harvester Credit Corporation and the property was insured by appellant. On December 5, 1977, Stanley contracted to sell his farm and most of his equipment to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitley v. IrwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. Hensley v. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co. of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  3. Wilbanks & Wilbanks, Inc. v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Gravning v. American Druggists' InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  5. Thurston National Insurance v. HaysSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. FooteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Gossett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  3. Beatty v. USAA Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Adams v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1989
  5. Hartford Insurance Co. v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API