Legal Opinion

United States v. John Edward Skidmore, Jr. (92-3665), and John Edward Skidmore, Sr. (92-3666)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 8, 1993No. 92-3665, 92-3666PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.

John Skidmore, Jr. and John Skidmore, Sr. were each charged with one count of selling an unlawful electronic device which permitted illegal interception of premium television channels, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2512(l)(b). The Skidmores agreed to plead guilty to the charge in return for the government’s agreement not to bring any additional charges against them. A provision of the plea agreement required the Skid-mores to forfeit substantial property to the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2513. The district court accepted the guilty pleas but…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. Charles Armen Calabrese, Samuel Ray Calabrese, Charles R. KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Jesus Antonio Partida-ParraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Frederick H. MandellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. United States v. Donelle FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Gregory Wells, M.D. (98-6010) Ronald Lee Dillion (98-6011)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. FoyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Joseph A. KrausCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API