Legal Opinion
Cooper v. Curallux LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 14, 2020No. 4:20-cv-02455Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JANICE COOPER, Case No. 20-cv-02455-PJH 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 10 CURALLUX LLC, DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 30, 31 12 13 14 Before the court is defendant Curallux LLC’s (“Curallux” or “defendant”) motion to 15 dismiss and motion to strike. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without 16 oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments 17 and the relevant legal authority, and good…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.