Legal Opinion

Condon v. Patel

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1984No. 3-983A288PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Presiding Judge.

The Patels sued Tina Condon after an automobile accident. Tina's insurance coverage was under a policy on which her father was the named insured. Tina's parents, Robert and Roberta, were joined as defendants approximately two months after the original complaint was filed. Eight months later, the Patels obtained a default judgment against the Condons for failure to plead. The Condons moved for relief from the judgment alleging, inter alia, mistake, surprise, and excusable neglect. 1 The trial court granted the Rule 60 motion only as to Robert. Tina and Roberta appeal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Siebert Oxidermo, Inc. v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Boles v. WeidnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Board of Zoning Appeals v. Shell Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kmart Corp. v. EnglebrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Cigna-INA/Aetna v. Hagerman-ShambaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Davis v. Eagle Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Bennett v. AndryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Jostens Learning Corp. v. Education System Corp. of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API