Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Galan

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2008No. 103845Published

1DissentJustice Freeman

Unlike the majority, I believe that this case presents a straightforward question of statutory construction. After examining the plain language of the Indiana fresh pursuit statute, the comments of the drafters, and the relevant precedent, I believe that the lower courts correctly held that application of the exclusionary rule is appropriate in the matter before us. I therefore dissent.

Indiana has enacted a statutory scheme that sets forth procedures to be followed when out-of-state law enforcement officers, who are in “fresh pursuit” of a suspect, arrest that person in Indiana. Ind. Code…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Detention of LiebermanIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Petersen v. WallachIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Burger v. Lutheran General HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Yang v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API