Legal Opinion

Yang v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2001No. 88656PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

This case is before us on a question of Illinois law certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. 145 Ill. 2d R. 20. The certified question is:

“Does section 9 — 102 of the Illinois Tort Immunity Act provide for attorneys’ fees against municipalities within its definition of compensatory damages?”

For the reasons that follow, we answer the certified question in the negative.

BACKGROUND

We take the following facts from the Seventh Circuit’s opinion in Yang v. City of Chicago, 198 F.3d 630 (7th Cir. 1999).

“On January 8, 1991, at approximately 11:00 p.m., Mike Yang…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mike Yang v. Paul HardinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Barnett v. Zion Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Harinek v. 161 North Clark Street Ltd. PartnershipIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Texaco-Cities Service Pipeline Co. v. McGawIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Bubb v. Springfield School District 186Illinois Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Sherman v. CrynsIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Petersen v. WallachIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Carver v. Sheriff of La Salle CountyIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Alvarez v. PappasIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  5. J.S.A. v. M.H.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API