Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Dade County v. E. B. Elliott Advertising Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 3, 1968No. 68-498PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARKDULL, Judge.
Subsequent to our opinion in State ex rel. Boozer v. City of Miami, Fla.App.1967, 193 So.2d 449, the appellee applied for a class “C” advertising permit to operate an outdoor display sign (or billboard) within 200 feet of an expressway. This application was denied. Thereafter, the appellee requested a class “B” permit for a point of sale sign, which was granted. Thereafter, notwithstanding a permit to operate only a class “B” sign, the appellee erected a class “C” sign contrary to its permit and contrary to the provisions of Ordinance No. 63-26, Code of Metropolitan Dade…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hinchee v. FisherSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Watson v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- Old Plantation Corp. v. Maule IndustriesSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Boozer v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Rott v. City of Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- E. B. Elliott Adv. Co., Henry F. Hill, Intervenor-Appellant v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Joseph v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- City of Miami Beach v. Dor Rich, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Holman Lincoln Mercury Co. v. Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968