Legal Opinion

State v. Wood

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 17, 2007No. 2006AP1338-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKessler, J.

¶ 1. Lorenzo Wood appeals from an order resentencing him over his repeated objections. Because the trial court, after concluding that a new factor in support of sentence modification had not been established, did not deny the motion, but instead converted the motion for sentence modification to a motion to vacate sentence, over the repeated objections of a pro se defendant, and then granted the converted motion and resentenced the defendant, we reverse and remand with instructions to vacate the sentence now in effect, to deny the motion to modify the sentence and to reinstate the sentence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Rosado v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. FranklinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. HegwoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SturdivantCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API