Legal Opinion

Pham v. Shinn

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 2, 2020No. 3:18-cv-08321Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Ngoc Lam Pham, No. CV-18-08321-PCT-JAT 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11 v. 12 Charles Ryan, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Doc. 16 1). The Magistrate Judge to whom this case was assigned issued a Report and 17 Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Petition be denied and dismissed with 18 prejudice. (Doc. 10). Petitioner filed objections to the R&R (Doc. 11); Respondents filed a 19 reply to the objections (Doc. 12). 20 I. Review of R&R…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API