Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Springdale

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 20, 1987No. 86-166PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

The appellant filed lengthy pleadings which, among other things, sought an injunction against the City of Springdale and its agents to prohibit the illegal exaction of taxes. The amended complaint contained about forty pages. The appellees filed a motion to dismiss. The chancellor dismissed the amended complaint for failure to state facts upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to A.R.C.P. Rule 12(b)(6). The appellant divides his argument on appeal into ten (10) different points, most of which have no merit. We will not address the unmeritorious assignments of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dreyfus v. BooneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Grable v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Klinger v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Massongill v. County of ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Stodola v. LynchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  5. IESI AR Corp. v. Northwest Arkansas Regional Solid Waste Management DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API