Legal Opinion · Dissent

Town & Country Chrysler v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 10, 1992No. WCB 89-22598; CA A68825Published

1DissentWarren, J.

The majority concludes that, when an employer requires a worker’s attendance at a recreational or social activity, any activity that the worker engages in while attending the required activity is not performed solely for the worker’s personal pleasure. 113 Or App at 438. Because I believe that a worker may engage in one form of recreational activity solely for personal pleasure during the course of a required social function, I dissent. See ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B).

Workers’ compensation benefits are only available for compensable injuries. ORS 656.017. An injury is compensable if the specific…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fitzgerald v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Mellis v. McEWEN, HANNA, GISVOLD, RANKIN & VAN KOTEN, EMPLOYERS, AND MISSION INS. CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Brown v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Burge v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API