Legal Opinion

Riger v. Hometown Mortgage, LLC

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided April 22, 2015No. 3:14-cv-00462-LRHPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Merly CS Riger’s (“Riger”) Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Certify Question of Law to the Nevada Supreme Court. Doc! # 45.1 Defendant U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) filed an Opposition (Doc. # 46), to which Riger did not reply.

I. Facts and Procedural Background

After purchasing-the subject property with her then-husband, Riger recorded a Deed of Trust with the Washoe County Recorder’s Office on April 26, 2004, naming Hometown Mortgage, LLC as the Lender, United Title of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Damme v. U.S. Bank N.A., as TrusteeDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
  2. Van Damme v. U.S. Bank N.A., as TrusteeDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API