Legal Opinion

Phoenix Physical Therapy v. Unemployment Insurance Division

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1997No. 96-581PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

Phoenix Physical Therapy appeals the decision of the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, affirming a decision of the Board of Labor Appeals. We affirm.

The issue is whether the District Court erred in affirming the decision of the Board of Labor Appeals which determined that Gail Nevin was an employee of Phoenix Physical Therapy.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Phoenix Physical Therapy (“PPT”) is engaged in the business of providing physical therapy services to patients on an individual basis. PPT is owned and operated by Janet Hulme, a physical therapist. On July 1, 1990, Hulme and Gail Nevin,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sharp v. Hoerner Waldorf Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Gypsy Highview Gathering System, Inc. v. StokesMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Kirby Co. of Bozeman, Inc. v. Employment Security DivisionMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hoehne v. Sherrodd, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gary & Leo's Fresh Foods, Inc. v. State, Department of Labor & IndustryMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Lewis v. B & B Pawnbrokers, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Johnson v. WESTERN TRANSPORT, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Lewis v. B & B PAWNBROKERS, INC.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Spain v. Montana Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API