Legal Opinion

Franks v. Heck & Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 12, 1918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Kenton Circuit Court (Criminal, Common Law and Equity Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll —

Affirming.

The appellant, Pranks, brought this suit against Heck & Co. to recover damages for malicious -prosecution , averring that they procured Ms arrest upon the charge of wrongfully and fraudulently converting property of another to Ms own use, and that upon Ms trial under this charge he was acquitted.

Heck & Co. in their answer admitted that they procured the arrest of Pranks but averred that they did so upon information showing probable cause for his arrest and under the belief in good faith that he was guilty of the charge under which he was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ahrens & Ott Manufacturing Co. v. HoeherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  2. Schwartz v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Keiner v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Meyer v. Louisville, &c., Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sills v. Paducah Box & Basket Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API