Legal Opinion

Brandt v. Burwell

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 20, 2014No. 14cv0681PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PERMANENT INJUNCTION

ARTHUR J. SCHWAB, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Within the past year, this Court has had the opportunity to consider arguments associated with injunctions filed in two other cases brought by ' substantially similar Plaintiffs against the same Government Defendants. See Most Reverend David A. Zubik et al. v. Secretary of the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, et. al. (case no. 13cvl459) (“the Zubik case”), and Most Reverend Lawrence T. Pérsico et. al v. Secretary of the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, et al.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. NEXT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. v. GMS MINE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Picard v. Phoenix Administrators, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  3. Picard v. Phoenix Administrators, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  4. Sara Picard v. Phoenix Administrators, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API