Legal Opinion

Patton v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 8, 1989No. 88-950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

This appeal involves claims based on wrongful death and personal injury arising out of the death of infant Corrie Duan Patton. After the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial. The motion was denied, and the plaintiff appealed. We affirm.

Ursula Patton was pregnant with twins and received prenatal care from Dr. Carl Palmer. Although an ultrasound test had been performed on the plaintiff when she was six months pregnant, neither she nor Dr. Palmer was aware that she was carrying twins. Ms. Patton went into labor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prescott v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Partridge v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Gulf Shores v. HARBERT INTERN.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Tuscaloosa County v. Jim Thomas Forestry Consultants, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API