Legal Opinion

Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 28, 1964No. 33205PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, defendant in the Circuit Court, seeks review by certiorari of a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, affirming, without opinion, an order of the Circuit Court denying petitioner’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Young Spring & Wire Corporation v. Smith, Fla.App.1963, 159 So.2d 120. Petitioner asserts that a direct conflict exists between the instant case and Fawcett Publications, Inc., v. Brown, Fla.App. 1962, 146 So.2d 899.

Probable jurisdiction having been made-to appear on the theory of “direct conflict,”' the cause was set down for oral…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BrunoSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. Rosenthal v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  3. Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  4. Home Development Co. of St. Petersburg v. BursaniSupreme Court of Florida · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  2. Florida Greyhound Owners & Breeders Ass'n v. West Flagler Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Florida Greyhound, Etc. v. West Flagler Assoc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API