Morrison v. St. Anthony Hotel, San Antonio
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentW. O. Murray, Chief Justice
(dissenting) .
I do not concur in the opinion of the majority. The suit as originally brought seemed to raise three main issues: (1) The right of Pan American Hotel Company to exercise its option to purchase the stock of the Class B stockholders, (2) the right of the Class B stockholders to recover dividends which they alleged should have been declared prior to the time Pan American Hotel Company exercised its option to purchase their stock, and (3) a claim for damages allegedly caused by breaches of fiduciary duties and mismanagement of the corporation. Apparently the trial court severed the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Biggins v. Oltmer Iron WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Boardman v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Pollitz v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Stinnett v. Paramount-Famous Lasky Corp. of New YorkTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Jermain v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.