Legal Opinion

Hagenback v. Randall

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1920No. 10,674PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Proceedings for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by Harriett Randall against the Carl Hagenback and Great Wallace Show Company. From an award for applicant, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRemy, P. J.

The findings of the Industrial Board which are material to a proper determination of the questions presented on this appeal are: Appellant is an Indiana corporation with its principal offices in the city of Indianapolis, and at all times since its organization has been engaged in the business of conducting a show. Appellee is the sole dependent of Harry Vincent Randall who lost his life, while in the employ of appellant. Randall’s contract of employment with appellant which was verbally made with appellant in West Baden, Indiana, was reduced to writing and executed in the State of Ohio, April…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of Jensen v. . Southern Pacific Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Hunter v. Colfax Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. State v. RichcreekIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. TeetersIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Mavity v. TyndallIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Owens v. Hagenbeck-Wallace Shows Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937
  3. Lutz v. New Albany City Plan CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Degray v. Miller Bros. Con. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  5. Duskin v. Pennsylvania-Central Airlines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API