Legal Opinion

Cousin v. Clackamas County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

If the county appropriated any part of the tract of land owned by the plaintiff which was not included within the boundaries of the road described in the resolution of the County Court authorizing the construction of the road, plaintiff would be entitled to the damages suffered thereby. His damages would include not only the value of the property taken but the damages resulting to the remainder of the tract. But if the land belonging to plaintiff and taken in the construction of the road is included within the boundaries of the proposed road as described in the resolution, the plaintiff is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Union Bridge Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Myers v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rogers v. HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API