Webster Motor Car Co. v. Packard Motor Car Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
The fixing of attorneys’ fees is always a delicate task. It is not fair to anyone to attempt to fix them on an hourly or a daily basis. The matters that have to be considered are the magnitude and the complexity of the issues involved, the standing of counsel at the bar — and in this case plaintiffs are represented by a leader of the bar and, I might also say in passing although it may be irrelevant, the defendants are represented by very able counsel — the skill exercised and the result achieved. All these imponderables and intangibles must be considered in fixing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Milwaukee Towne Corp. v. Loew's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Brookside Theatre Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Paramount Film Distributing Corporation v. Joe ApplebaumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Cape Cod Food Products, Inc. v. National Cranberry Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
3Cited by13 opinions
- Farmington Dowel Products Co. v. Forster Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. GoldwynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Bergjans Farm Dairy Co. v. Sanitary Milk ProducersDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1965
- Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1979
- Bal Theatre Corp. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.