Legal Opinion

Krupp v. Craig

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

In this case the declaration sets out a cause of action in assumpsit, in a form which was used in this Commonwealth before the practice act was adopted in 1852, and is one which may now be used if the pleader elects to do so. See American Precedents of Declarations (1821), 126. See Raymond v. Eldridge, 111 Mass. 390. The answer of the defendant is a general denial, a plea of payment, and the statute of limitations.

At the close of the evidence the judge, in response to a motion by the defendant that on all the evidence a verdict be directed for him, ruled as follows: “ I am going to grant the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harmon v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Seward v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Raymond v. EldridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. Sargent v. LordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GalvinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. McGlue v. Weekly Publications, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1946
  3. Beverly Hospital v. EarlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Pierce v. TiernanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API