Legal Opinion

Turney v. Allstate Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1950No. Appeal, No. 81PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

This is an action in assumpsit by plaintiff on a policy of automobile insurance issued by defendant. The court below sustained defendant’s preliminary objections to plaintiff’s complaint and held that, under the terms of the insurance contract and the admitted facts, the policy had been effectively canceled by the insurer before the loss occurred.

The following facts which appear from the pleadings are not disputed: The policy providing for collision insurance on plaintiff’s automobile was issued by defendant on November 5, 1948, at a total,premium of $53.71, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gendron v. Calvert Fire Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Wallace v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Fischer & Porter Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Leslie v. Standard Accident InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  5. Gosch v. Firemen's InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jensen v. Traders & General Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Ampy v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  3. Hall v. Motorists Insurance CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Heaven Sent, Ltd. v. Centennial Insurance Co. (In Re Heaven Sent, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Jensen v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API