Legal Opinion

Wiesenfeld v. Rosenfeld

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 6, 1936No. [Nos. 95, 96, October Term, 1935.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

By the residuary clause of her will, executed February 11th, 1891, Mrs. Betzey Wiesenfeld devised and bequeathed her estate as follows:

“Item; I give, devise and bequeath all the rest and residue of my worldly estate (all of the rest and residue of my lands, tenements, goods, chattels, rights and credits) unto my said executors their survivors and survivor, In Trust and confidence however for the uses, intents, and purposes herein presently mentioned and declared of and concerning the same, that is to say; In Trust for the use and benefit of my nine children, Caroline, David, Rebecca, Amelia,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fairfax v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  2. Thomas v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  3. Byrne v. GunningCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  4. Marshall v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  5. Wilson v. PichonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hillwood v. HillwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  2. Judik v. TraversCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  3. Veditz v. AtheyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. Weller v. SokolCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. Gallaudet University v. National Society of the Daughters of the American RevolutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API