Wilson v. Pichon
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
On this appeal the only question is whether a remainder is vested or contingent. The chancellor held it to have vested on the death of the testator.
It has been often declared by this court that the early vesting of estates is favored, and that “in doubtful cases the interest should be held to be vested rather than contingent, unless the instrument under consideration does not admit of such construction.” Miller, Construction of Wills, 630. As stated in Tayloe v. Mosher, 29 Md. 443, 457: “Estates will be held to be vested wherever it can be done without doing violence to the language of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Tayloe v. MosherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
- Dulany v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- Larmour v. RichCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
- Demill v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
- Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Robinson v. Mercantile Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Pyne v. PyneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. Bergdorf & Goodman Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
- Wesley Home, Inc. v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Boulden v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.