Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Trobaugh Ex Rel. Trobaugh v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 2001No. NonePublished

1DissentAmundson, Justice

[¶ 42.] I agree with the majority’s analysis concluding there was a lack of express permission by Juffer as to prohibit coverage under the omnibus clause. I disagree, however, with the majority’s conclusion that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to implied permission. Hence, there should also be a dismissal of the negligent entrustment claims. As such, the trial court should be affirmed on all grounds.

Implied Permission

[¶ 43.] Certain facts are undisputed. In the present ease Amy was given conditional permission to operate the Taurus, which was owned, licensed and insured by her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Arbach v. GrubaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Dickinson v. Great American Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Pettis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Stover v. CritchfieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. American Family Insurance Group v. HoweDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API