Estate of Trobaugh Ex Rel. Trobaugh v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentAmundson, Justice
[¶ 42.] I agree with the majority’s analysis concluding there was a lack of express permission by Juffer as to prohibit coverage under the omnibus clause. I disagree, however, with the majority’s conclusion that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to implied permission. Hence, there should also be a dismissal of the negligent entrustment claims. As such, the trial court should be affirmed on all grounds.
Implied Permission
[¶ 43.] Certain facts are undisputed. In the present ease Amy was given conditional permission to operate the Taurus, which was owned, licensed and insured by her…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arbach v. GrubaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Dickinson v. Great American Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Pettis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Stover v. CritchfieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- American Family Insurance Group v. HoweDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.