Stout v. Pate
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
A direct bill of exceptions will not lie to a judgment sustaining or striking a plea of res judicata, for the reason that such judgment is not final or otherwise within the meaning of Code (Ann. Supp.) § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1890-91, p. 82; 1946, pp. 726, 730). City of Tallapoosa v. Brock, 143 Ga. 599 (85 S. E. 755); Johnson v. Merchants’ & Farmers’ Bank, 141 Ga. 721 (81 S. E. 873); Harris v. Stowers, 192 Ga. 215 (15 S. E. 2d, 193); Peerless Laundry Co. v. Abraham, 193 Ga. 179 (17 S. E. 2d, 267). The judgment here complained of, in which the plaintiff’s plea of res judicata…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Tallapoosa v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Johnson v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Peerless Laundry Co. v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Harris v. StowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Duke v. WilderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956