Legal Opinion

Stout v. Pate

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1953No. 18102PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

A direct bill of exceptions will not lie to a judgment sustaining or striking a plea of res judicata, for the reason that such judgment is not final or otherwise within the meaning of Code (Ann. Supp.) § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1890-91, p. 82; 1946, pp. 726, 730). City of Tallapoosa v. Brock, 143 Ga. 599 (85 S. E. 755); Johnson v. Merchants’ & Farmers’ Bank, 141 Ga. 721 (81 S. E. 873); Harris v. Stowers, 192 Ga. 215 (15 S. E. 2d, 193); Peerless Laundry Co. v. Abraham, 193 Ga. 179 (17 S. E. 2d, 267). The judgment here complained of, in which the plaintiff’s plea of res judicata…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Tallapoosa v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  2. Johnson v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Peerless Laundry Co. v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Harris v. StowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  2. Duke v. WilderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API